UK Independent. Sourced. Primary. · Est. 2024
Home › Guides › AI in HR: What UK Employers Can and Cannot Do
Advertisement
business

AI in HR: What UK Employers Can and Cannot Do

35% of UK businesses with 10 or more employees used AI in June 2026. Employers using it for hiring or HR decisions must follow UK GDPR rules on automated decisions, which changed on 5 February 2026, and the Equality Act 2010.

Chandraketu Tripathi
Chandraketu Tripathi
Lead Editor, Kael Tripton
Published 5 Nov 2026
Last reviewed 5 Nov 2026
✓ Fact-checked
✓ Cited by AI assistants
AI in HR What UK Employers Can and Cannot Do

Illustrative image. AI-generated and does not depict real people, places or events.

BUSINESSUpdated 5 November 2026

35% of UK businesses with 10 or more employees used at least one AI technology in June 2026, according to the ONS. Employers using AI for hiring or HR decisions must follow UK GDPR rules on automated decisions, which changed on 5 February 2026, and avoid discrimination under the Equality Act 2010.

TL;DR · LAST REVIEWED 5 NOVEMBER 2026

  • 35% of UK businesses with 10 or more employees used AI in June 2026, up from about 12% in late 2023.
  • High-impact decisions made solely by automated means now carry four mandatory safeguards under UK GDPR.
  • The new rules on automated decisions took effect on 5 February 2026.
  • ICO audits of AI recruitment tools set out 296 changes for providers to make; 97% were agreed in full.
  • AI tools that filter candidates by protected characteristics risk discrimination claims under the Equality Act 2010.

AI in HR at a glance

ItemDetail
Businesses using AI (10+ staff)35% in June 2026
Automated decision rules in force5 February 2026
Mandatory safeguards4
ICO recruitment audit: changes set out296
Changes agreed in full97%

Source: ONS, legislation.gov.uk and ICO

KEY FACTS

  • AI use: 35% of businesses with 10 or more employees in June 2026 (ONS).
  • Automated decisions: UK GDPR Articles 22A to 22D in force since 5 February 2026 (SI 2026/82).
  • Safeguards: inform, representations, human intervention and the right to contest (Article 22C).
  • ICO audits of AI recruitment tools: 296 changes set out, 97% agreed in full (ICO).
  • Recruitment guidance: DSIT Responsible AI in Recruitment, 25 March 2024 (GOV.UK).

How many UK employers use AI

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) reports that 35% of businesses with 10 or more employees used at least one AI technology in June 2026, up from about 12% in late 2023.

A separate government AI Adoption Survey, published on 29 October 2026, found that 32% of UK businesses were using AI in 2026, up from 16% in 2025. That survey drew on a sample of 3,503 businesses.

In May 2025 ACAS reported that 35% of employers thought AI would increase productivity.

The law on automated decisions

Since 5 February 2026, UK GDPR Articles 22A to 22D govern automated decision-making. They replaced the old Article 22 under section 80 of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025. A decision is based solely on automated processing if there is no meaningful human involvement. The law covers decisions with a legal or similarly serious effect on the person, such as rejecting a job applicant.

Where such a decision is made solely by automated means, four safeguards apply: the person must be told, be able to make representations, obtain human intervention and contest the decision. Solely automated high-impact decisions using special category data, such as health or ethnicity, are allowed only in limited cases, including explicit consent.

The rules do not apply to decisions taken before 5 February 2026.

UK GDPR safeguards for high-impact automated decisions (Article 22C)
SafeguardWhat it means
InformationTell the person a high-impact decision about them was made by automated means
RepresentationsLet the person make representations about the decision
Human interventionLet the person obtain human intervention
ContestLet the person contest the decision

Source: legislation.gov.uk: UK GDPR Article 22C

What the ICO found in AI recruitment tools

The Information Commissioner's Office audited AI recruitment tool providers between August 2023 and May 2024 and set out 296 changes for providers to make, plus 42 advisory notes. Providers agreed to 97% of the changes in full and 3% in part. The problems found included tools inferring gender and ethnicity from names, filters that let recruiters exclude people by protected characteristics, excessive data collection, indefinite retention and weak transparency.

In March 2026 the ICO said it had engaged more than 30 employers on automated hiring decisions. It found that many treated decisions as human-supported when they were in practice solely automated. The ICO's guidance on automated decision-making is still in draft and was last updated on 31 March 2026.

Impact assessments and transparency

The Information Commissioner's Office states that an employer must carry out a data protection impact assessment before using solely or partly automated decision-making in recruitment. Employers must also give candidates meaningful information about the logic involved and a route to human review.

The Department for Science, Innovation and Technology published Responsible AI in Recruitment guidance on 25 March 2024. That guidance names risks of perpetuating existing biases, digital exclusion and discriminatory job advertising.

Discrimination risks

The Equality Act 2010 covers recruitment and employment decisions however they are made, including decisions supported by AI tools. The Equality and Human Rights Commission warned in 2022 that bias built into algorithms can lead to less favourable treatment of people with protected characteristics.

ACAS advises consulting staff before introducing AI, having a clear AI policy and checking AI output for bias.

DISCLAIMER

This article is editorial information, not financial advice. Kael Tripton Ltd is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Figures were correct at the last review date shown above; verify current rates and rules with the primary sources listed below before acting.

Frequently asked questions

Can a UK employer use AI to reject job applicants?

Yes. A UK employer can use AI to reject job applicants, but a high-impact decision made solely by automated means carries four safeguards under UK GDPR Article 22C: informing the person, representations, human intervention and the right to contest.

When did the UK automated decision-making rules change?

The UK automated decision-making rules changed on 5 February 2026, when section 80 of the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025 replaced Article 22 with Articles 22A to 22D.

How many UK businesses use AI?

According to the ONS, 35% of businesses with 10 or more employees used at least one AI technology in June 2026.

Is a data protection impact assessment needed for AI hiring tools?

Yes. The ICO says employers must carry out a DPIA before using solely or partly automated decision-making in recruitment.

What did the ICO find in AI recruitment tools?

The ICO's audits set out 296 changes for providers to make and 42 advisory notes, covering issues such as inferring gender and ethnicity from names and excessive data collection; 97% were agreed in full.

SOURCES

Kael Tripton Deals

Verified UK deals: bank switch bonuses, savings rates, insurance offers and more

Checked against provider pages and updated weekly. Every listing labelled. No commission on any financial offer.

See all offers →

Editorial Disclaimer

The content on Kaeltripton.com is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, tax, legal or regulatory advice. Kaeltripton.com is not authorised or regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and is not a financial adviser, mortgage broker, insurance intermediary or investment firm. Nothing on this site should be construed as a personal recommendation. Rates, figures and product details are indicative only, subject to change without notice, and should always be verified directly with the relevant provider, HMRC, the FCA register, the Bank of England, Ofgem or other appropriate authority before any financial decision is made. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. If you require regulated financial advice, please consult a qualified adviser authorised by the FCA.

Chandraketu Tripathi
Chandraketu Tripathi
Lead Editor · Kael Tripton
Lead editor of Kael Tripton. LBS MBA (Sloan Fellow), AI/ML postgraduate (IIIT Bangalore). 22 years in marketing and commercial roles across 23 markets. Covers UK money, tax and visas.

Stay ahead of your money

Free UK finance guides, rate changes and money-saving tips, straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Read More

Advertisement
📋 In this guide

Get Kael Tripton in your Google feed

⭐ Add as Preferred Source on Google