LAST REVIEWED: JUNE 2026
TL;DR
When ranking the best digital banks UK savers can open in 2026, the single most important distinction is regulatory: Monzo, Starling, Chase UK, Kroo and Zopa hold a full Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) banking licence with deposits protected by the FSCS up to £85,000, whereas money held in a Revolut UK e-money account is safeguarded rather than FSCS-protected. This guide compares licence status, deposit protection, everyday features and savings rates side by side.
KEY FACTS
- A full UK banking licence is granted by the PRA and supervised jointly by the PRA and FCA; an e-money institution is authorised by the FCA under the Electronic Money Regulations and does not take protected deposits.
- Eligible deposits at a PRA-licensed bank are protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) up to £85,000 per person, per banking licence.
- Money in an e-money account is safeguarded in a separate account at another bank, not covered by the FSCS, so payouts are not guaranteed to the £85,000 limit.
- Payment services, including faster payments and refunds for unauthorised transactions, are governed by the Payment Services Regulations 2017.
- The FCA Consumer Duty, in force since July 2023, requires firms to deliver good outcomes and avoid foreseeable harm, including on savings rates and fair value.
- Revolut was granted a UK banking licence with restrictions and entered the mobilisation stage; until it fully launches UK banking, customer balances continue under the e-money model.
Digital banks have moved from novelty to the default way millions of people in the UK manage money. App-based current accounts, instant spending notifications, automatic budgeting and fee-free spending abroad are now table stakes. But behind near-identical glossy apps sit very different legal structures, and that difference decides what happens to your money if the provider fails. This comparison of the best digital banks UK customers can use in 2026 focuses on the things that actually matter for safety and value: whether the provider holds a PRA banking licence or operates as an e-money institution, whether your balance is covered by the FSCS, how the everyday features stack up, and how competitive the savings rates are.
The seven providers covered here are Monzo, Starling, Revolut, Chase UK, Kroo, Dozens and Zopa. They span the full range, from established licensed challengers with millions of customers to smaller specialists and one large incumbent (JPMorgan Chase) operating a UK retail brand. The aim is not to crown a single winner for everyone, because the right account depends on whether you value branch access, the strongest deposit protection, the best travel features or the highest interest. The aim is to make the trade-offs explicit.
Bank licence versus e-money status: the distinction that decides safety
The most consequential thing to understand about any app-based account is its regulatory status. In the UK there are two broadly different permissions a fintech can hold, and they are not equivalent.
A full banking licence is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), the part of the Bank of England responsible for the safety and soundness of banks, and supervised jointly by the PRA and the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). A licensed bank can take deposits, must hold regulatory capital, is subject to prudential rules, and crucially its eligible deposits are protected by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. Monzo, Starling, Chase UK, Kroo and Zopa all operate as licensed banks.
An electronic money institution (EMI) is authorised by the FCA under the Electronic Money Regulations 2011 and provides payment services under the Payment Services Regulations 2017. An EMI is not a bank. It does not take deposits in the legal sense, does not lend your money out, and does not provide FSCS deposit protection. Instead it must safeguard customer funds, typically by ring-fencing them in a separate account held at an authorised credit institution. Revolut has historically operated its UK consumer offering through an e-money model.
Revolut's position is changing. The company was granted a UK banking licence with restrictions and entered what the PRA calls the mobilisation stage, a standard, time-limited period in which a newly authorised bank builds out its systems and controls before fully launching as a bank with a small initial deposit cap. Until that transition completes and balances are formally migrated to the licensed bank, money held in a Revolut UK account continues under the e-money safeguarding regime rather than under FSCS deposit protection. Anyone relying on Revolut should check the current status of their specific account in the app and on the FCA Register.
Why does this matter in practice? If a licensed bank fails, the FSCS aims to return eligible deposits up to £85,000 per person within days, automatically. If an EMI fails, customers rely on the safeguarded funds being correctly held and on an administration process to return them; there is no FSCS backstop and no guaranteed compensation limit, and the return of funds can take longer. For an everyday spending balance the practical risk may feel small, but for anyone holding meaningful sums the distinction is central.
| Provider | Regulatory status | Regulator(s) | Takes protected deposits? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monzo | Full UK banking licence | PRA and FCA | Yes |
| Starling | Full UK banking licence | PRA and FCA | Yes |
| Chase UK | Full UK banking licence (JPMorgan Chase) | PRA and FCA | Yes |
| Kroo | Full UK banking licence | PRA and FCA | Yes |
| Zopa | Full UK banking licence | PRA and FCA | Yes |
| Revolut (UK) | E-money institution; UK banking licence granted with restrictions, in mobilisation | FCA (PRA on full bank launch) | Not yet (e-money is safeguarded) |
| Dozens | E-money for current account; investment products separately regulated | FCA | Current account funds safeguarded, not FSCS deposit-protected |
Always confirm a provider's current permissions on the FCA Register before opening an account, because authorisations and statuses change. The Register is the authoritative source for what a firm is permitted to do and which protections apply.
FSCS protection: what the £85,000 limit really covers
The Financial Services Compensation Scheme is the UK's statutory safety net for customers of authorised financial firms. For deposits, it protects eligible balances up to £85,000 per person, per banking licence, paid out automatically and usually within seven days if a bank fails. Joint accounts are covered up to £170,000 because each holder has their own £85,000 limit.
Two subtleties trip people up. First, the limit applies per banking licence, not per brand or per account. If two brands share one licence, your combined balance across both is protected only to £85,000. Second, FSCS deposit protection only applies to licensed banks and building societies. Money held with an e-money institution is not within the FSCS deposit scheme at all. Instead, the EMI must safeguard customer funds under the Electronic Money Regulations and Payment Services Regulations 2017, typically by placing them in a segregated account at a separate authorised bank. If the EMI fails, customers depend on those safeguarded funds being correctly held and on the administration process; the £85,000 FSCS guarantee does not apply.
This is the single biggest reason the licence question matters when comparing digital banks. A high savings rate or a slick travel feature is worth little if a large balance sits outside FSCS protection. For larger sums, many people deliberately spread money across multiple separate banking licences so each tranche stays within the £85,000 cap.
| Provider | Protection type | FSCS deposit cover | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monzo | FSCS deposit protection | Up to £85,000 per person | Holds its own banking licence |
| Starling | FSCS deposit protection | Up to £85,000 per person | Holds its own banking licence |
| Chase UK | FSCS deposit protection | Up to £85,000 per person | Under JPMorgan Chase's UK licence; check shared-licence limits |
| Kroo | FSCS deposit protection | Up to £85,000 per person | Holds its own banking licence |
| Zopa | FSCS deposit protection | Up to £85,000 per person | Holds its own banking licence |
| Revolut (UK) | Safeguarding (e-money) | Not while operating as e-money | FSCS deposit cover expected once it fully launches as a UK bank |
| Dozens | Safeguarding (e-money) for current account | Not for e-money balances | Investment products carry their own separate protections |
Everyday features compared: budgeting, pots, joint accounts and overseas spend
Once the safety picture is clear, the day-to-day experience is what most people live with. The digital banks differ in their feature philosophies. Monzo built its reputation on budgeting and money-management tools, with category spending breakdowns, salary sorting, savings Pots and bill-splitting. Starling pairs a clean current account with Spaces for goal-based saving, strong joint-account support and a marketplace of connected products, and it stands out for offering business banking as well. Chase UK leans on simplicity, cashback on everyday spending (subject to terms and time limits) and fee-free spending abroad backed by JPMorgan's scale.
Revolut's strength is international: multi-currency accounts, competitive exchange rates on weekdays, and a broad feature set spanning travel, spending analytics and add-on subscriptions. Kroo positions itself around interest on the current account balance and a sociable money-sharing angle. Zopa comes from a savings and lending heritage and emphasises competitive savings products and credit alongside its current account. Dozens blends a current account with budgeting and investing features under one app, reflecting its money-management focus.
Two features deserve particular attention. Joint accounts are not universal: some app-first providers launched without them and added them later, so anyone needing a shared account for household bills should confirm availability. Overseas spending also varies: several providers offer fee-free card spending abroad up to monthly limits, after which fees or weekend exchange markups can apply, so the small print matters for frequent travellers.
| Provider | Budgeting | Pots / Spaces | Joint account | Savings | Overseas spend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monzo | Strong, category-based | Pots, incl. saving Pots | Yes | Savings Pots and accounts | No FX fee on card spend (limits on free cash withdrawals) |
| Starling | Good, with insights | Spaces (goal saving) | Yes | Interest-paying Spaces / accounts | No added FX fee on card spend |
| Chase UK | Good, with round-ups | Savings pots / accounts | Check availability | Saver account | No FX fee on card spend (terms apply) |
| Kroo | Basic to moderate | Limited / evolving | Check availability | Interest on current balance | Fee-free abroad up to limits |
| Zopa | Moderate | Pots / smart saver | Check availability | Competitive savings range | Card terms apply |
| Revolut (UK) | Strong analytics | Vaults / pockets | Group / shared features | Savings vaults (interest varies) | Multi-currency; weekend FX markup, free up to limits |
| Dozens | Money-management focus | Saving / investing jars | Check availability | Saving and investment products | Card terms apply |
Feature sets change frequently as these providers ship updates, so treat the table as a guide and confirm specifics in each app before switching. The columns marked "check availability" reflect features that have varied over time or by account tier.
Interest and savings rates: how the providers compare on returns
Interest is where digital banks have competed hardest, and where the FCA Consumer Duty has had a visible effect. Some accounts pay credit interest on the everyday current-account balance, others pay it only through linked savers or pots, and the headline figures move with the Bank of England base rate. Because exact rates change often, the comparison below is qualitative; check the live rate in each app or on each provider's website before deciding.
Kroo has tended to pay interest directly on current-account balances, an unusual feature among challengers. Chase UK has offered a competitive easy-access saver and periodic boosted introductory rates. Zopa, with its savings heritage, typically promotes some of the more competitive easy-access and fixed savings rates among the group. Monzo and Starling pay interest through savings Pots and Spaces or instant-access savers, with rates that vary by tier and over time. Revolut pays interest via savings vaults, with rates and structures that differ by plan and can depend on a third-party money market arrangement, which is a different mechanism from a simple FSCS-protected savings deposit. The practical lesson is to compare the AER and the protection type together, not the rate alone.
| Provider | Interest on current account? | Savings approach | Rate competitiveness (qualitative) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Monzo | Via some plans / pots | Savings Pots and instant-access savers | Moderate, varies by tier; FSCS-protected |
| Starling | Yes, up to a balance cap | Interest-paying Spaces / accounts | Moderate; FSCS-protected |
| Chase UK | Via saver / periodic offers | Easy-access saver, sometimes boosted intro rate | Competitive easy-access; FSCS-protected |
| Kroo | Yes, on balance (terms apply) | Interest paid on current balance | Notable for current-account interest; FSCS-protected |
| Zopa | Via linked savings | Easy-access and fixed savings range | Often among the more competitive; FSCS-protected |
| Revolut (UK) | Via savings vaults by plan | Savings vaults, sometimes money-market backed | Varies by plan; check protection mechanism |
| Dozens | No (current account is e-money) | Separate saving and investment products | Depends on product; protections differ by wrapper |
The headline rate is only half the story. A savings product held inside an FSCS-protected bank account behaves very differently in a crisis from a higher headline yield delivered through a money market fund or an e-money vault, where the protection mechanism is not FSCS deposit cover. Read how interest is paid and how the underlying money is protected before chasing the top number.
App-only versus branch access, and what the Consumer Duty changes
Almost all of these providers are app-only or app-first, with no branch network. That suits people comfortable managing money on a phone and who value features such as instant notifications, in-app freezing of cards and 24/7 support chat. It is less suited to anyone who relies on counter services, wants to pay in large amounts of cash regularly, or prefers face-to-face help. Cash deposits are usually possible only through Post Office or PayPoint arrangements where supported, often with limits and sometimes fees. Customers who need branch banking alongside a digital app may prefer a traditional bank's app, or run a digital account alongside a legacy current account.
The regulatory backdrop has tightened in the consumer's favour. The Payment Services Regulations 2017 govern how payments work and set out rights around unauthorised transactions, refunds and the handling of complaints, applying to both banks and e-money firms. On top of that, the FCA Consumer Duty, in force from July 2023, raised the bar across the board. It requires firms to act to deliver good outcomes for retail customers, to provide fair value, to communicate clearly, to support customers including the vulnerable, and to avoid foreseeable harm. In savings, the Duty has pushed firms to justify the rates they pay and to alert customers languishing in poor-value accounts. When comparing digital banks, the Duty means you can reasonably expect clear pricing, fair-value savings and accessible support, and you can complain and escalate to the Financial Ombudsman Service if a firm falls short. None of this, however, substitutes for FSCS deposit protection, which is why licence status remains the anchor of any safety comparison.
How to choose between them
There is no universal best account, but the trade-offs are now clear. Anyone whose priority is the strongest safety net should favour the providers holding a full PRA banking licence with FSCS deposit protection: Monzo, Starling, Chase UK, Kroo and Zopa. Frequent travellers who hold modest balances and value multi-currency tools may still find Revolut compelling, while keeping the e-money safeguarding distinction in mind and tracking its transition to a full UK bank. Households needing a shared account should confirm joint-account availability, which is not offered everywhere. Savers focused on returns should compare the AER and the protection mechanism together, leaning towards FSCS-protected savings from the likes of Zopa, Chase UK, Kroo, Monzo and Starling.
A practical approach many people take is to keep a larger protected balance with a licensed bank and use an e-money app only for travel or day-to-day spending money. Whatever the choice, verify the provider's current permissions on the FCA Register, confirm the FSCS status of any balance you care about, and read how interest is paid before opening an account.
Frequently asked questions
Are digital banks safe in the UK?
Digital banks that hold a full UK banking licence from the PRA, such as Monzo, Starling, Chase UK, Kroo and Zopa, protect eligible deposits through the FSCS up to £85,000 per person, the same protection as any high-street bank. E-money providers safeguard your money in a separate account rather than offering FSCS deposit protection, which is a weaker safety net. Always check a firm's status on the FCA Register.
Is Revolut a bank in the UK?
Revolut has historically operated its UK consumer service as an e-money institution authorised by the FCA. It was granted a UK banking licence with restrictions and entered the mobilisation stage, a standard step before fully launching as a bank. Until that transition completes and balances migrate, UK balances are safeguarded under the e-money model rather than covered by FSCS deposit protection.
What is the difference between a banking licence and an e-money licence?
A banking licence is granted by the PRA and lets a firm take deposits with FSCS protection up to £85,000. An e-money institution is authorised by the FCA, cannot take protected deposits, and must instead safeguard customer funds in a segregated account at a separate bank. The difference decides what happens to your money if the provider fails.
Does FSCS protection cover money in an e-money account?
No. FSCS deposit protection applies only to licensed banks and building societies. Money in an e-money account is safeguarded under the Electronic Money Regulations and Payment Services Regulations 2017, not protected by the FSCS, so there is no guaranteed £85,000 payout if the firm fails.
Which digital bank pays interest on the current account balance?
Kroo has been notable for paying interest directly on current-account balances, subject to terms. Others, including Monzo, Starling, Chase UK and Zopa, more commonly pay interest through linked savings pots, Spaces or savers. Rates change with the Bank of England base rate, so check the live AER in each app before deciding.
Can I get a joint account with a digital bank?
Some digital banks offer joint accounts and some do not, and several added them only after launch. Monzo and Starling support joint accounts; for others, confirm availability in the app before relying on it for shared household bills.
Sources
- FCA: Financial Services Register and firm authorisations
- Bank of England / PRA: prudential regulation and new bank authorisation (mobilisation)
- FSCS: what is protected and the £85,000 deposit limit
- GOV.UK / legislation.gov.uk: Payment Services Regulations 2017
- FCA: Consumer Duty
- GOV.UK / legislation.gov.uk: Electronic Money Regulations 2011