Life Insurance
Applying for life cover with a mental health history
Anxiety, depression and other mental health conditions are routinely underwritten for life insurance. This guide explains what insurers ask, how severity is assessed and what to declare to keep cover secure.
TL;DR
Most people with a mental health history can obtain life insurance, and mild, well-managed conditions such as treated anxiety or depression often attract standard terms. The Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 requires applicants to answer health questions with reasonable care, and the FCA's Consumer Duty requires insurers to treat customers fairly.
Last reviewed: 22 June 2026
|
Key Facts
|
How mental health is assessed in underwriting
Mental health conditions span a broad spectrum, and the underwriting outcome reflects where an individual sits on that spectrum. A single episode of situational anxiety that resolved with a short course of treatment is assessed very differently from a long history of severe depression with hospital admissions. Underwriters look at the diagnosis, severity, duration, current symptoms, treatment, and crucially any history of self-harm or suicidal ideation, because these factors carry the most weight in the mortality assessment.
For the most common presentations, mild to moderate anxiety or depression that is stable and managed, many insurers offer standard terms. As severity rises, for example with recurrent severe episodes, bipolar disorder, psychosis or recent hospital treatment, a premium loading or postponement becomes more likely. The assessment is individualised rather than based on the diagnostic label alone.
Two questions drive much of the rating: how well controlled the condition is now, and whether there is any history of self-harm or attempted suicide. Stability over time and the absence of such history generally support better terms. This is the application of risk data, not a comment on the applicant.
What insurers ask about
The application asks for the specific diagnosis, when it began, current and past treatment including medication and therapy, time off work related to mental health, any hospital admissions, and any history of self-harm or suicidal thoughts. You may be asked whether symptoms are present now and how they affect daily life. The GP practice name is usually requested so evidence can be sought if needed.
Answering with care is both a legal duty and practical protection. The Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 requires reasonable care not to misrepresent your health in response to the questions asked. Mental health history can be difficult to recall precisely, so checking dates and treatment details before applying reduces the risk of an inadvertent error.
Where the answers indicate a more significant history, the insurer may seek a GP report under the Access to Medical Reports Act 1988. That legislation gives you the right to be told, to see the report before it is sent if you ask in time, and to request corrections of factual errors. Medical evidence often supports the applicant by confirming stability and good management.
Equality law and fair treatment
The Equality Act 2010 makes it unlawful to discriminate against a person on the basis of a protected characteristic, which includes disability, and a long-term mental health condition can meet the definition of disability. Insurers are permitted to assess risk and price accordingly, but any difference in treatment must be based on relevant and reliable information that it is reasonable to rely on. Blanket refusals unsupported by such evidence are not acceptable.
In practice this means an insurer should not decline or load a policy simply because a mental health condition is mentioned, without considering its severity and the evidence. The FCA's Consumer Duty reinforces this by requiring firms to deliver fair outcomes and avoid foreseeable harm to customers, including those who may be vulnerable.
If an applicant believes a decision is based on outdated assumptions rather than genuine risk evidence, they can challenge it through the insurer's complaints process and, if unresolved, through the Financial Ombudsman Service, which considers whether the insurer acted fairly and on a reasonable basis.
Possible outcomes and how to improve terms
The common outcomes are standard terms, a premium loading, a postponement until a condition has been stable for longer, or in higher-risk cases a decline. For mental health, exclusions are less typical for life cover because death from any cause is the insured event, although they appear more often in income protection and critical illness products.
Several things can help. Demonstrating a sustained period of stability, being in regular contact with a GP, and showing that any past crisis is well in the past all support better terms. Applying when symptoms are settled rather than during an acute episode is sensible. As with any medical underwriting, insurer appetite varies, so a quote from one company is not the final word.
An adviser familiar with mental health underwriting can identify insurers more likely to offer favourable terms for a particular history. The applicant should still answer every question accurately, because the strength of any offer rests on truthful, complete disclosure backed by the medical evidence.
Keeping your cover secure
Accurate disclosure is the foundation of a policy the insurer cannot later dispute. Under the 2012 Act, a deliberate or reckless misrepresentation lets the insurer avoid the policy, while a careless misrepresentation leads to a proportionate remedy reflecting what it would have done with the full facts. Because mental health history is sensitive and detailed, careful answers at application stage are the best safeguard for beneficiaries.
Retaining a record of the questions answered and any GP report provides evidence that reasonable care was taken. If a claim is later questioned, this record helps demonstrate that the application was completed honestly and fully.
Where a claim is declined and the family believes the outcome is unfair, the insurer's complaints process is the first step, followed by referral to the Financial Ombudsman Service. The Ombudsman reviews whether the questions were clear, whether reasonable care was taken, and whether the correct legal remedy was applied.
Disclaimer: This article is general information about UK life insurance and mental health underwriting and is not financial or medical advice. Decisions depend on individual circumstances and vary between insurers. Confirm terms and any conditions directly with the insurer or a regulated adviser before relying on them, as criteria and figures change.
Frequently asked questions
Can I get life insurance if I take antidepressants?
Yes, in most cases. Mild to moderate, well-managed depression or anxiety, including when treated with medication, frequently attracts standard terms. Severity, recurrence and any self-harm history have a larger effect than medication alone.
Do I have to mention counselling or therapy I have had?
If the application asks about treatment for mental health, yes. The Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 requires you to take reasonable care in answering the questions, which generally include therapy and counselling as well as medication.
Can an insurer refuse me just because of a mental health diagnosis?
A decision must be based on relevant, reliable risk evidence under the Equality Act 2010, not a blanket assumption. The severity and history matter; an insurer should consider the actual circumstances rather than the label alone.
Will declaring suicidal thoughts affect my application?
A history of self-harm or suicidal ideation is one of the most significant underwriting factors and may lead to a loading or postponement. It still must be declared if asked, and stability over time generally improves the assessment.
What can be done if a decision seems unfair?
Use the insurer's complaints process first. If you remain dissatisfied, you can refer the matter free of charge to the Financial Ombudsman Service, which considers whether the insurer acted fairly and on a reasonable evidential basis.
Sources:
- Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 (legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/6/contents)
- Equality Act 2010 (legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents)
- Access to Medical Reports Act 1988 (legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/28/contents)
- FCA Consumer Duty (fca.org.uk/firms/consumer-duty)
- Financial Ombudsman Service: insurance complaints (financial-ombudsman.org.uk)